|
08.18.05
Internet
Porn Exists And .xxx Is Just Simpler
 By
Jason Lee Miller
Though people have been leery for years about regulating the Internet, that reticent
stance is exactly what has caused a Wild West of online porn sites that don't
care who sees what they're peddling. Recently, in their ever-efficient way, the
two ruling parties of the United States government have been in a tizzy over the
topic, and it is becoming clear that Internet regulation is soon to be a reality-even
if either party hasn't fully agreed on how to handle it. One's blind and the other
is trying to kill a fly with a bazooka.
Introduced into the Senate in late July and backed by Sen. Lieberman's camp, the
Internet Safety and
Child Protection Act of 2005 outlines strict guidelines for pornographic websites,
requiring operators to be aggressive about how the content on their sites is accessed
by requiring credit card age verification before any content is shown.
The act also introduces a 25% "smut tax," the proceeds of which will be placed
in a lock box entitled the Internet Safety and Child Protection Trust Fund. This
fund will pay for enforcement, a cyber tip-line, a "crimes against children task
force," and research grants.
Write
10,000 lines of code in 10 minutes!
Iron Speed Designer - Free
Evaluation |
|
Meanwhile, back at the White House where the existence of such material has just
been realized, President Bush has come out against the creation of a .xxx domain
for pornographic websites, joining the ranks who are uncomfortable with the idea
of a "virtual red light district."
The two responses to the issue are problematic, each in their own way. Those on
the Bush side of things seem to not even want to recognize such things exist,
as acknowledgement seems in some way a validation of the trade. They say that
creating a special area for pornographic sites is, indirectly, of voice of support
for it.
Am I wrong in saying that admitting something exists is not really a validation?
I don't like cats. I think they're useless, allergenic, lazy nuisances. By admitting
they exist and that many people like them, am I making a sort of indirect endorsement?
No. I'm just being realistic. Porn exists, it's not going away, and a grown-up
will admit it.
If the .xxx domain is denied by the conservative powers that be, it will, by default,
fall into line with the Internet Safety and Child Protection Act, which is complicated,
potentially unconstitutional, and difficult to enforce.
Wouldn't it be simpler to set up the .xxx domain and then require online pornographers
to release their .coms and switch to the new domain? How easy would it be to set
up filters to block out content from this "red light district?" It's the same
as having a part of town you just don't go into. Simple, streamlined, and with
less of all the pesky site by site policing.
About the Author:
Jason L. Miller is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business.
More
news_ebusiness_news Articles
Contact
WebProNews |
